Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01869
Original file (PD2012 01869.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD1201869        
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20131224
SEPARATION DATE: 20050514                


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSG/E-6 (88M, Motor Transport Operator) medically separated for irritable bowel syndrome. The CI began experiencing symptoms while deployed in 1991 is support of Operations Desert Storm. He continued to experience symptoms and was treated conservatively. He exited the active Army in 1999 and evaluated through the Veterans Administration Healthcare System. He was given the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome and a disability rating of 30%. He re-entered the Army and continued to experience problems. In September of 2004 he was referred to the gastroenterology (GI) service at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center for more extensive evaluation and treatment. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The irritable bowel syndrome condition, characterized as not meeting standards was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB. The PEB adjudicated irritable bowel syndrome as unfitting, rated 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I received a medical board which resulted in my discharge from the military service due to irritable bowel syndrome at 10% disabling. I was subsequently awarded a 30% disability from the Department of Veterans Affairs for the same disability of irritable bowel syndrome.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting irritable bowel syndrome condition is addressed below. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050225
VA - (4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Irritable Bowel Syndrome 7319 10% Irritable Bowel Syndrome 7319 30% *20050912
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
Other x 2 20050912
Combined: 10%
Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 51221 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ). Prior VA 30% rating effective 19990805 to 20010927 .
*C&P Exam dated 20050912 not available.



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Irritable Bowel Syndrome Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes a history onset of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, loose stools 3-4/day and cramps in 1991. There was a questionable exposure to nerve agent and he took anti-nerve agent pills. Symptoms continued to the level of numerous sick call visits for GI complaints with improvement of symptoms on 2-3 Imodium per day. He was diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome in 1999. Evaluations including blood and stool lab work, colonoscopy and colon biopsy did not find any other pathology (not ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease) aside from reflux esophagitis and a diaphragmatic hernia.

At the MEB exam, the CI reported his current condition as having “between 4 and 22 bowel motions per day and in a typical day between 10 and 15 bowel motions. The bowels motions are loose, almost always associated with abdominal cramping and frequently associated with rectal urgency. Over the last year, the soldier experienced 5 episodes of stool soiling.” The MEB physical exam noted normal physical findings including normal bowel sounds and a soft abdomen. The NARSUM diagnosis was “irritable bowel syndrome, severe, unresponsive to normal therapy, with between 10 and 15 loose bowel motions each day associated with abdominal cramping and rectal urgency.”

The VA rating determination dated 21 December 2005 stated During VA examination (dated 20050912; four months after separation) you stated that you use Imodium about 8 times a day and this does not always help. You go to the bathroom 9 to 15 times a day, which is associated with cramping and it does not seem to be exacerbated by any particular food. Only not eating or drinking helps.” The VA rated this exam at 30% coded 7319.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The record clearly supports the PEB and VA diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome and use of disability code 7319 (irritable colon syndrome, spastic colitis, mucous colitis, irritable bowel, etc.). There was no indication of gastrointestinal surgery, anemia or overall poor health in the records. The Board focused on rating under 7319 and deliberated if the CI’s symptoms more nearly approximated the 30% rating criteria of Severe; diarrhea, or alternating diarrhea and constipation, with more or less constant abdominal distress“ or the 10% criteria of Moderate; frequent episodes of bowel disturbance with abdominal distress.” Given the NARSUM characterization of severe irritable bowel syndrome and the number of daily symptomatic bowel movements with abdominal cramping and urgency, the Board considered that the symptoms were greater than the 10% “Moderate” level.

After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board majority recommends a disability rating of 30% for the irritable bowel syndrome condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the irritable bowel syndrome condition, the Board by a vote of 2:1 recommends a disability rating of 30%, coded 7319 IAW VASRD §4.114. The single voter for dissent (who recommended 10% coded 7319) submitted the appended minority opinion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Irritable Bowel Syndrome 7319 30%
COMBINED 30%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20121028, w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans
’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review



MINORITY OPINION:

The Service Treatment Record (STR) recounts a long history dating back to 1991 of chronic diarrhea and possible Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). In February 1992 the CI separated from service at his expiration of term of service. He reenlisted in October 1992 and served until August 1999 when he separated due to parenthood. His STR entries available for review during these two periods of service contain scant entries for bowel problems. In 1999, the CI applied for and received a disability rating from the VA, which included a 30% rating for IBS. Yet in September 2001 he again reenlisted. On his Report of Medical History dated 17 July 2001, the CI
denied having had any illnesses and denied having received any pension or compensation for any disability or injury. He stated he was in good health. His Report of Medical Examination dated that same day was normal with respect to the GI system and made no mention of anything related to IBS. The CI reentered active duty. On a Pre-Deployment Health Assessment dated 28 March 2003 he stated his health was very good and there was no mention of anything related to IBS. In August 2004, he reported chronic diarrhea to his Primary Care provider and was referred for GI specialty evaluation. Objective testing and lab work was normal. In October 2004, the CI stated he wanted to be retained, although he felt unable to continue in his MOS and the CI’s Primary Care provider counseled the CI regarding an MOS Medical Retention Board (MMRB) and initiated the first and only profile in the record for IBS (permanent P3) with a recommendation for an MMRB. The Senior Profiling Officer/Approving Authority however directed the CI be referred to the MEB. The PEB in its narrative on the DA Form 199, in arriving at its 10% rating, states “multiple medical evaluations and radiographic studies concluded the diagnosis to be irritable bowel syndrome although there were no physical findings on any of the examinations. The physical and laboratory examinations were reported to be normal and a colonoscopy in October 2004 was within normal limits.”

Additionally, performance information in the CI’s three NCOERs during his last period of enlistment does not support a conclusion that the CI’s condition was severe. In two reports he was rated among the best and recommended for early promotions and positions of increased responsibility. In his last NCOER that closed out in October 2004, he was again rated among the best with noted unlimited potential and a recommendation to promote.

The VASRD criteria for rating IBS are subjective with the severe rating at 30% stating there is diarrhea with more or less constant abdominal distress, and the moderate rating at 10% stating there are frequent episodes of bowel disturbance with abdominal distress. Based on my review of the totality of the available evidence, I conclude that the CI’s longstanding condition, which he apparently performed extremely well with, did not rise to the level of severe. While it is possible the CI had a clinical flare up of his symptoms, his reported symptoms at the time of referral to the MEB by the senior profiling officer, were inconsistent with the objective evidence and with the performance reports which gave no indication of functional impact. There were few STR entries from August to October 2004 for IBS before referral to the MEB
; and, the CI clearly felt his condition was not severe as he desired to be retained and retrained.

In conclusion, based on all of the evidence I considered, it is more likely than not that the IBS was appropriately rated 10%. I agree with the PEB’s conclusions and therefore do not find reasonable justification for recommending a change in the PEB adjudication. And I strongly believe there is an insufficient functional impact to support or justify the majority recommendation.

I respectfully urge the Secretary to adopt the minority recommendation that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation rating determination.





invalid font number 31502 SFMR-RB  invalid font number 31502

invalid font number 31502 MEMORANDUM invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 FOR invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Commander, invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 US invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Army invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Physical invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Disability invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Agency invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 (AHRC-DO), invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 2900 invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Crystal invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Drive, invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Suite invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 300, invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Arlington, invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 VA invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 22202-3557
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 SUBJECT: invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Department invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 of invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Defense invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Physical invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Disability invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Board invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 of invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Review invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Recommendation invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 for invalid font number 31502 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502 , invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 AR20140007197 invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 (PD201201869)
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
1.      
invalid font number 31502 I invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 have invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 reviewed invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 the invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 enclosed invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Department invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 of invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Defense invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Physical invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Disability invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Board invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 of invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Review invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 (DoD invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 PDBR) invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 recommendation invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 and invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 record invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 of invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 proceedings invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 pertaining invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 to invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 the invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 subject invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 individual. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Under invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 the invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 authority invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 of invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Title invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 10, invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 United invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 States invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Code, invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 section invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 1554a, invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 I invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 reject invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 the invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Board's invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 recommendation invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 and invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 accept invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 the invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Board's invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 minority invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 opinion invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 as invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 accurate invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 that invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 the invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 applicant's invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 final invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Physical invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Evaluation invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Board invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 disability invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 rating invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 remains invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 unchanged. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 There invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 is invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 insufficient invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 justification invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 to invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 support invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 the invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Board's invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 recommendation invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 in invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 accordance invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 with invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Army invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 and invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Department invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 of invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Defense invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 regulations.
invalid font number 31502
2.      
invalid font number 31502 This invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 decision invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 is invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 final. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 individual invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 concerned, invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 counsel invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 (if invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 any), invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 and invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 any invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Members invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 of invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Congress invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 who invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 have invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 shown invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 interest invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 in invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 this invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 application invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 have invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 been invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 notified invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 of invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 this invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 decision invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 by invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 mail.
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 BY invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 ORDER invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 OF invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 THE invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 SECRETARY invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 OF invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 THE invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 ARMY:


invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502          XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 Encl invalid font number 31502      invalid font number 31502 Deputy invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Assistant invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Secretary
invalid font number 31502 (Army invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Review invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Boards)
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 CF:
invalid font number 31502 ( invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 ) invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 DoD invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 PDBR
( ) D VA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00387

    Original file (PD-2014-00387.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRDstandards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. She reported GI symptoms 8 months out of the year. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPresidentDoD Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01695

    Original file (PD2012 01695.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded “esophageal reflux, nonulcerative dyspepsia (NUD), IBS, generalized anxiety disorder, and social phobia” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E.The PEB adjudicated the IBS (visceral hyperalgesia) condition as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). After due deliberation, the Board consensus was that the preponderance of the evidence with regard to the functional impairment of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00168

    Original file (PD2013 00168.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flare ups were accompanied by abdominal pain in the right upper and lower quadrants, without identifiable triggers.On examination the CI was noted to be in no distress and the examination of the abdomen was non-tender. The Board undertook a careful review of the treatment records and noted the report of constant abdominal pain in every entry; however, clinical examinations noted no distress during physical exams, and examination of the abdomen was generally reported as normal. Service...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01029

    Original file (PD2012-01029.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the IBS with chronic abdominal pain and diarrhea condition. Any abdominal disability from this condition was appropriately considered as a comprehensive abdominal condition under the CI’s unfitting 7319 abdominal condition discussed above. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00696

    Original file (PD2012 00696.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB’s 10% rating was based on a combined 7319 code (IBS) and analogous 7323 code (ulcerative colitis).The VA assigned a 60% ratingunder an analogous 7323 code for Crohn’s disease deemed to be “severe; with numerous attacks a year and malnutrition, the health only fair during remissions.” However, the VA additionally assigned 10% for separately rated irritable bowel...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01788

    Original file (PD-2014-01788.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The bowel and hip conditions, characterized as “irritable bowel syndrome [IBS] with chronic pain and bloating” and “snapping hip syndrome,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Snapping Hip Syndrome . The DA Form 2173( Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status ),dated 14 December 2005, noted complaints of bilateral hip pain during mobilization training in August 2004, with increasing hip pain due to the weight of gear and weight loss.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00980

    Original file (PD-2014-00980.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “abdominal pain, due to irritable bowel syndrome, with gastritis” and “chronic subjective neck pain status post fusion, without neurologic abnormality, cervical range of motion limited by pain”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, respectively, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The report of medical examination (DD...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01119

    Original file (PD-2013-01119.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    CI CONTENTION :“Please consider increasing my disability rating to at least 30% which is more consistent with the VA's initial rating of 30% for my chronic GI illness dated 20020821 (please note, the 30% I received was the maximum allowed rating in code 7325/7319 of the VA's Schedule of Ratings for Irritable Colon Syndrome at the time of my separation.) I'd ask you to also consider my Anxiety Disorder related to general medical condition (VA 30% effective date 20060923) and Recurrent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01664

    Original file (PD2012 01664.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions characterized as MEB diagnoses 1)“irritable bowel syndrome”, 2)“stress fracture left tibia and fibular stress reactions with pain”, and 3)“lower abdominal pain and low back pain”, were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.ThePEB adjudicatedthe IBS, subsuming the 3rd MEB diagnosis,as unfitting, rated 10% and adjudicated tibial and fibular stress fractures, as unfitting, rated 0%with likely application of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01500

    Original file (PD 2012 01500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Dysthymic Disorder943310%Generalized Anxiety D/O, Dysthymic D/O, and Panic D/O with Agoraphobia, with Excessive Daytime Sleepiness940050%20071129Generalized Anxiety DisorderCategory 2Panic Disorder w/o AgoraphobiaCategory 2Irritable Bowel Syndrome731910%Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease7319-734610%20071210Gastroesophageal RefluxCategory 2Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 320071210 Combined: 20%Combined:...